The HOT Alternative recommended in MTIS deserves consideration
(A summary from the MTIS and other documents in the Transportation Library)
On page 83 of the December 10, 1998 MTIS Final Report, the consultant recommends consideration of a HOT (High-Occupancy Toll - pronounced hot) Lane alternative for Hwy 1 :
The difference between this concept and the Carpool Lane concept evaluated in the Alternative 3 investment strategy is that single-occupant vehicles can buy their way onto the lane -- thus generating additional revenues for the project. This strategy is suggested because of the additional revenue tolls could generate, and the present strong interest in and availability of Federal demonstration funds for HOT projects across the country. ... With a potential federal match of up to 80%, the possibility of additional state funds and toll generated revenues, the financial feasibility of such a project increases significantly over the concept discussed in the MTIS Task 13, Financial Feasibility Report.
This alternative by far outscores all other options in meeting the four challenges of the MTIS study: 1) reducing Hwy 1 congestion, 2) improving direct express bus link to UCSC, 3) accommodating weekend and beach traffic, and 4) being financially feasible. It would address the needs of the vast majority of County residents who rely on the automobile while allowing the County to, for once, provide positive incentives to carpooling and transit use on an express lane removed from auto congestion.
HOT lanes can best be described as new or existing high-occupancy vehicle facilities that are open to solo drivers for a fee. Advantages and features of the HOT alternative include:
Non-stop electronic toll collection using windshield-mounted transponder tags -- makes HOT lanes feasible without the need for toll booths or toll plazas. HOT lanes can be separated from regular lanes simply by pavement striping and plastic pylons. Electronic and video technology can assist with enforcement.
Revenue is generated for transportation corridor improvements, both highway and transit.
By filling up carpool lanes when underutilized, they keep HOV lanes at their optimum utilization and relieve political pressure to decommision them.
By diverting some solo drivers from the adjoining general-purpose lanes, they help to reduce congestion in those lanes.
They provide a premium travel option to solo drivers who have a special need to reach their destination on time and are willing to pay for the privilege.
In a situation very similar to ours here in Santa Cruz , the Environmental Defense Fund supports a HOT lane on Hwy 101 over the proposed Rail system in Sonoma -- on mobility, economic and environmental grounds.
More information on HOT lanes can be found through links in the Transportation Library at www.cruzio.com/~forums